Evaluation of the UNFPA response to the Syria crisis (2011-2018)

Resource date: 2019

 
Watch Hicham Daoudi, UNFPA Evaluation Advisor, outline key highlights of the evaluation

This evaluation is an independent assessment of the UNFPA overall response to the Syria humanitarian crisis including its contribution to the Whole of Syria approach. The evaluation particularly draws lessons from UNFPA past and current Syria humanitarian crisis responses and recommends the way forward for future humanitarian responses, both in the sub region and elsewhere.

The evaluation covers all UNFPA humanitarian interventions targeting populations affected by the conflict in Syria from 2011 to 2018, both within Syria and in neighbouring countries (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey).

 
 
The 29 findings of the evaluation relate to the evaluation's ten questions, clustered around key evaluation criteria such as relevance, coverage, cordination, coherence, connectedness, efficiency and effectiveness.  
 
 
Watch presentation of the evaluation to the Executive Board annual session 2019

 

Additional material supporting the evaluation results are available here.

Volume 2 (annexes)

Country notes

Syria | Iraq | Jordan | Lebanon | Turkey 

Case studies

Regional Response Hub | Cross-Border Interventions 

Inception Report

Terms of Reference

Evaluation Quality Assessment

DOCUMENTS

Related content

Administrative Resource
The synthesis validates effective programmatic approaches and those that limit progress to accelerate UNFPA and partners’ efforts to achieve the organization’s three transformative results.
Administrative Resource
The purpose of the evaluation is to assess the extent to which, and under what circumstances, the Joint Programme has contributed to accelerating the abandonment of FGM over the last ten years.
Administrative Resource
The purpose of the joint evaluation was to provide an independent assessment of progress towards results, sustainability of interventions and programme efficiency and effectiveness, bearing in mind the complexity of programme operations across the four regions and 12 countries.

Pages

We use cookies and other identifiers to help improve your online experience. By using our website you agree to this. To learn more, including how to change your settings, see our cookies policy.

X