|
Notes
1. Save the Children. 2001. Behind Every
Healthy Child is a Healthy Mother.
Report of the Symposium on the
Linkages Between Maternal Health,
Family Planning, and Child Survival.
Washington, D.C., 24 July 2001.
Web site: www.savethechildren.org/
publications/reproductive_health.pdf,
last accessed 7 May 2004.
2. WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA. 2003.
Maternal Mortality in 2000: Estimates
Developed by WHO, UNICEF, and
UNFPA. Geneva: WHO.
3. Safe Motherhood Initiative. 2003. Web
site: http://www.safemotherhood.org,
accessed 22 February 2004. The
wide range of 30 to 50 reflects the
difficulties of defining and measuring
maternal morbidity. Underreporting,
misclassification and failure to
recognize the condition are common
due to social and cultural factors,
the nature of the conditions and the
resources available to assess them.
4. United Nations. 1995. Population and
Development, vol. 1: Programme of
Action adopted at the International
Conference on Population and
Development: Cairo: 5-13 September
1994, paragraph 8.22. New York:
Department of Economic and Social
Information and Policy Analysis,
United Nations.
5. Freedman, L., et al. 2004. “Interim
Report of Task Force 4 on Child
Health and Maternal Health,” p. 54.
New York: UN Millennium Project.
6. Liljestrand, J. 2000. “Strategies
to Reduce Maternal Mortality
Worldwide.” Current Opinion in
Obstetrics and Gynecology 12(6):
513-517.
7. Starrs, A. 1998. The Safe Motherhood
Action Agenda: Priorities for the Next
Decade, p. 9. New York: Family Care
International.
8. Liljestrand 2000.
9.UNFPA. 2004a. Saving Mothers’
Lives: The Challenge Continues.
Brochure. New York: UNFPA.
10. United Nations. 1999. Key Actions
for the Further Implementation of
the Programme of Action of the
International Conference on Population
and Development (A/S-21/5/Add.1),
paragraph 62(a) and 62(b).
New York: United Nations.
11. United Nations. 2004. Review and
Appraisal of the Progress Made In
Achieving the Goals and Objectives
of the Programme of Action of the
International Conference on Population
and Development: Report of the
Secretary-General (E/CN.9/2004/3).
New York: United Nations.
12. WHO. 2003a. International
Statistical Classification of Disease and
Related Health Problems, 10th rev.
Geneva: WHO.
13 Maine, D., and T. McGinn. 1999.
“Maternal Mortality and Morbidity.”
Ch. 31 in: Women and Health, edited
by M. Goldman and M. Hatch. 1999.
San Diego, California: Academic
Press.
14. WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA 2003.
15. Graham, W., et al. 2004. “The
Familial Technique for Linking
Maternal Death with Poverty.”
The Lancet 363(9402): 23-27.
16. Kunst, A. E., and T. Houweling,
“A Global Picture of Poor-rich
Differences in the Utilisation of
Delivery Care.” Pp. 297-315 in: Safe
Motherhood Strategies: A Review of
the Evidence, by V. De Brouwere and
W.Van Lerberghe. 2001. Studies in
Health Services Organisation and
Policy Series. No 17. Antwerp: ITG
Press.
17. WHO. 2004. Personal communication
on forthcoming publications.
18. Maine and McGinn 1999.
19. Fortney, J., and J. Smith, J. 1996.
The Base of the Iceberg: Prevalence
and Perceptions of Maternal Morbidity
in Four Developing Countries.
Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina: Maternal and Neonatal
Health Center, Family Health
International.
20. Donnay, F., and L. Weil. 2004.
“Obstetric Fistula: The International
Response.” The Lancet 363(9402):
71-72.
21. Gay, J., et al. 2003. What Works:
A Policy and Program Guide to the
Evidence on Family Planning, Safe
Motherhood, and STI/HIV/AIDS
Interventions: Module 1: Safe
Motherhood. Washington, D.C.:
The POLICY Project.
22. Saving Mother’s Lives: What Works:
Field Guide for Implementing Best Practices in Safe Motherhood. 2002.
Washington, D.C.: The White
Ribbon Alliance for Safe
Motherhood/India.
23. Global Health Council. 2002.
Promises to Keep: The Toll of
Unintended Pregnancies on Women’s
Lives in the Developing World.
Washington, D.C.: Global
Health Council.
24. WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA 2003.
25. Ibid.
26. Fortney, J., and J. Smith. 1999.
“Measuring Maternal Morbidity.”
Pp. 43-50 in Safe Motherhood
Initiatives: Critical Issues, edited
by M. Berer and T. K. S. Ravindran.
1999. Oxford, United Kingdom:
Blackwell Science for Reproductive
Health Matters.
27. UNFPA. 2004b. Investing in People:
National Progress in Implementing the
ICPD Programme of Action 1994-2004,
p. 46. New York: UNFPA.
28. Pathmanathan, I., et al. 2003.
Investing in Maternal Health: Learning
from Malaysia and Sri Lanka. Human
Development Network. Health,
Nutrition and Population Discussion
Paper. Washington D.C.: The World
Bank.
29. Ibid.
30. UNFPA 2004b, p. 45.
31. Materials provided by the UNFPA
Division of Latin America and the
Caribbean.
32. WHO and UNICEF. 2003. Antenatal
Care in Developing Countries:
Promises, Achievements and Missed
Opportunities : An Analysis of Trends,
Levels, and Differentials: 1990-2001.
Geneva and New York: WHO and
UNICEF.
33. Liljestrand, J. 1999. “Commentary:
Reducing Perinatal and Maternal
Mortality in the World: The Major
Challenges.” British Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology 106(9):
877-880.
34. UNFPA 2004b, p. 46.
35. Graham, W., J. S. Bell, and
H. W. Bullough. 2001. “Can Skilled
Attendance at Delivery Reduce
Maternal Mortality in Developing
Countries?” Pp. 97-129 in: Safe
Motherhood Strategies: A Review of
the Evidence, by V. De Brouwere and
W.Van Lerberghe. 2001. Studies in
Health Services Organisation and
Policy Series. No 17. Antwerp:
ITG Press.
36. Evidence regarding the effect of
skilled attendance at delivery is
complicated by the different
definitions used by countries in the
training and regulation of midwives.
37. WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, and the
World Bank. 1999. Reduction of
Maternal Mortality: A Joint
WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank
Statement. Geneva: WHO.
38. Cunningham, F. G., et al. 1993.
Williams Obstetrics, 19th Edition.
Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton &
Lange. Cited in: “Background Paper
of the Millennium Project Task Force
on Child Health and Maternal
Health,” by L. Freedman, et al. 2003.
New York: United Nations
Millennium Project.
39. Graham, Bell, and Bullough 2001.
40. UNFPA 2004b, p. 45.
41. UNICEF, WHO, and UNFPA. 1997.
Guidelines for Monitoring and
Availability and Use of Obstetric
Services. New York: UNICEF.
42.Averting Maternal Death and
Disability (AMDD). 2003. AMDD
Notebook, p. 7. No. 8. New York:
Averting Maternal Death and
Disability, Mailman School of Public
Health, Columbia University.
43. UNFPA 2004b, p. 46.
44. UNFPA 2004a.
45. Cholil, A., M. B. Iskandar, and
R. Sciortino. 1998. The Life Saver:
The Mother Friendly Movement in
Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia:
The State Ministry for the Role of
Women and the Ford Foundation.
46. Lalonde, A. B., et al. 2003. “Averting
Maternal Death and Disability: The
FIGO Save the Mothers Initiative:
The Uganda-Canada Collaboration.”
International Journal of Gynecology
and Obstetrics 80(2): 204-212.
47. WHO. 2003b.
48. UNICEF, WHO, and UNFPA 1997.
49. United Nations 1995, paragraph
8.25.
50. See: Hardee, K., et al. Forthcoming.
What Works: A Policy and Program
Guide to the Evidence on Family
Planning, Safe Motherhood, and
STI/HIV/AIDS Interventions: Module
2: Postabortion Care. Washington,
D.C., and Baltimore, Maryland:
POLICY Project, the Futures Group;
FRONTIERS Program, the Population
Council; and INFO Project, Center
for Communication Programs, Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health.
51. “Appendix E: Postabortion Care in
Kenya: Case Study.” p. 12 in: Global
Evaluation of USAID’s Postabortion
Care Program,” by L Cobb, et al.
2001. Washington, D.C.: Poptech.
52. Postabortion Care Consortium
Community Task Force. 2002.
“Essential Elements of Postabortion
Care: An Expanded and Updated Model.” PAC in Action, No. 2. Special
Supplement.
53. Billings, D., J. Fuentes Velásquez,
and R. Pérez-Cuevas. 2003.
“Comparing the Quality of Three
Models of Postabortion Care in
Public Hospitals in Mexico City.”
International Family Planning
Perspectives 29(3): 112-120;
Johnson, B., et al. 2002. “Reducing
Unplanned Pregnancy and Abortion
in Zimbabwe through Postabortion
Contraception.” Studies in Family
Planning 33(2): 195-202; Medina,
R., et al. 2001. Expansion of
Postpartum/Postabortion
Contraception in Honduras.
FRONTIERS Program Final Report.
Washington, D.C.: The Population
Council; and Lema, V., and V.
Mpanga. 2000. “Post-abortion
Contraceptive Acceptability in
Blantyre, Malawi.” East African
Medical Journal 77(9): 488-493.
54. Huntington, D., and L. Nawar. 2003.
“Moving from Research to Program:
The Egyptian Postabortion Care
Initiative.” International Family
Planning Perspectives 29(3): 121-125.
55. Megied, A., and A. Hassan. 2003.
“Decentralization of Post-abortion
Care to District Hospitals and Rural
Health Units.” Paper presented at
the 17th International Federation of
Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO)
World Congress of Gynecology and
Obstetrics, Santiago, Chile, 2-7
November 2003.
56. Htay, T. T., J. Sauvarin, and S. Khan.
2003. “Integration of Post-Abortion
Care: The Role of Township Medical
Officers and Midwives in Mynamar.”
Reproductive Health Matters 11(21):
27-36.
57. Gebreselassie, H., and T. Fetters.
2002. Responding to Unsafe Abortion
in Ethiopia: A Facility-based
Assessment of Postabortion Care
Services in Public Health Sector
Facilities in Ethiopia. Chapel Hill,
North Carolina: Ipas.
58. Solo, J., et al. 1998. “Creating
Linkages Between Incomplete
Abortion Treatment and Family
Planning Services in Kenya: What
Works Best.” Operations Research
Technical Assistance Africa Project
II. Paper Presented at the Global
Meeting, Advances and Challenges
in Postabortion Care Operations
Research. New York: The Population
Council.
59. The Population Council. 2000.
Meeting Women’s Health Care
Needs After Abortion. Frontiers in
Reproductive Health Program Brief.
No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Frontiers in
Reproductive Health, the Population
Council.
60. Settergren, S., et al. 1999.
Community Perspectives on Unsafe
Abortion and Postabortion Care: Bulawayo and Hwange Districts,
Zimbabwe. Washington, D.C.:
POLICY Project, the Futures
Group International.
61. See: Gay, J., et al., 2003.
62. Castro, R., et al. 2000. “A Study
of Maternal Mortality in Mexico
Through a Qualitative Approach.”
Journal of Women’s Health and
Gender-Based Medicine 9(6):
679-690.
63. Seone, G., V. Kaune, and V. Cordova.
1996. Diagnostico: Barreras y
Viabilizadores en la Atencion de
Complicaciones Obstetricas y
Neonatales. La Paz, Bolivia:
MotherCare Bolivia, John Snow, Inc.,
and Marketing S.R.C.
64. Kempe, E., et al. 1994. The Quality
of Maternal and Neonatal Services in
Yemen: Seen Through Women’s Eyes.
Stockholm: Save the Children
Sweden.
65. UNFPA 2004b, p. 46.
66. JHPIEGO, Save the Children, and
Family Care International. 2003.
Shaping Policy for Maternal and
Newborn Health: A Compendium of
Case Studies. Baltimore, Maryland:
Maternal and Neonatal Health
Project, JHPIEGO; and Gay, J.,
et al., 2003.
67. Mercer, J. 2000. “Family-Centered
Maternity Care in Moldova.” In:
MotherCare’s Initiatives: Actions and
Results of 31 Projects: 1993-2000,
edited by S. Jessop, et al. Arlington,
Virginia: John Snow International.
68. Glatleider, P., P. Paluzzi, and
C. Conroy. 2000. “Changing the
Way Maternity Care Is Delivered
in the Ukraine.” In: MotherCare’s
Initiatives: Actions and Results of 31
Project:, 1993-2000, edited by
S. Jessop, et al. Arlington, Virginia:
John Snow International.
69. MotherCare/SEATS. 2000.
“MotherCare/SEATS, JSI
Collaborative Project in Novosibirsk
and Primorksy Krai, Russia.” In:
MotherCare’s Initiatives: Actions and
Results of 31 Projects: 1993-2000,
edited by S. Jessop, et al. Arlington,
Virginia: John Snow International.
70. Campero, L., et al. 1998. “‘Alone I
Wouldn’t Have Known What To
Do’: A Qualitative Study on Social
Support During Labor and Delivery
in Mexico.” Social Science and
Medicine 47(3): 395-403; and
Langer, A., et al. 1993. “The Latin
American Trial of Psychosocial
Support During Pregnancy: A Social
Intervention Evaluated Through an
Experimental Design.” Social Science
and Medicine 36(4): 495-507.
71. Carter, M. W. 2002. “‘Because He
Loves Me’: Husbands’ Involvement
in Maternal Health in Rural Guatemala.” Culture, Health, and
Sexuality 4(3): 259-279
72. Abdel-Tawab, N., et al. 2002.
“Recovery from Abortion and
Miscarriage in Egypt: Does
Counseling Husbands Help?” Ch. 10
in: Responding to Cairo: Case Studies
of Changing Practice in Reproductive
Health and Family Planning, edited
by N. Haberland and D. Measham.
2002. New York: The Population
Council.
73. Program for Appropriate Technology
in Health. 2002. “Men and
Reproductive Health Programme
Examples: India: Nandesari.”
Reproductive Health Outlook web site:
www.rho.org/html/menrh_
progexamples.htm#india-nandesari,
last accessed 3 May 2004; and
Raju, S., and A. Leonard. 2000. Men
as Supportive Partners in Reproductive
Health: Moving from Rhetoric to
Reality, pp. 46-47, 52. New Delhi:
South and East Asia Regional Office,
the Population Council.
74. UNFPA. 2003. Maternal Mortality
Update 2002: A Focus on Emergency
Obstetric Care, pp. 17-34. New York:
UNFPA.
75. UNFPA 2004a.
76. UNFPA 2004b, p. 46; and UNFPA
2004a.
| 
