|
UNFPA GLOBAL POPULATION POLICY UPDATE
Issue 4 - June 8 2003
This issue of the Global Population Policy Update focuses on official development
assistance by developed countries. In the Call to Action of the Ottawa Commitment
adopted at the International Parliamentarians’ Conference on the Implementation
of the ICPD Programme of Action (November 2002, Ottawa, Canada), parliamentarians
from around the world pledged to "strive to fulfil the agreed target of 0.7
per cent of GNP for official development assistance (ODA) and make every effort
to mobilize the agreed estimated financial resources needed to implement the
ICPD Programme of Action."
The following information is quoted from a 22 April 2003 report by the Organisation
for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) entitled, "OECD DAC Countries
Begin Recovery in Development Aid: 5% Increase in 2002."
Member countries of the OECD's Development Assistance Committee increased
their official development assistance to developing countries by 4.9% in real
terms, accounting for inflation, from 2001 to 2002. The total amounted to
$57 billion, equivalent to 0.23% of their combined resources, measured as
gross national income (GNI), marking the beginning of a recovery from the
all-time lows of 0.22% of GNI in each of the last three years.
Donor countries committed to increasing their official development assistance
(ODA) to developing countries in the context of the International Conference
on Financing for Development held in Monterrey, Mexico, in March 2002. According
to OECD estimates, fulfilling these promises would raise ODA in real terms
by 31% (about $16 billion) and the ODA/GNI ratio to 0.26% by 2006-still well
below the ratio of 0.33% consistently achieved until 1992.
DAC member countries account for at least 95% of worldwide ODA disbursements.
The United States remains the world's largest aid donor in volume terms, followed
by Japan, Germany, France and the United Kingdom.
Twelve of the twenty-two DAC member countries reported an increase in ODA
in real terms; for nine of them the increase was over 10%. Denmark, Luxembourg,
the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden are still the only countries to meet the
United Nations ODA target of 0.7% of GNI. Three other countries have given
a firm date to reach the 0.7% target: Belgium by 2010; Ireland by 2007; and
France to reach 0.5% by 2007 and 0.7% by 2012.
The United States increased its ODA by 11.6% in real terms in 2002 to $12.9
billion, representing 0.12% of its GNI. This increase was mainly due to additional
and emergency funds in response to the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks
as well as new aid initiatives, especially in relation to health and humanitarian
aid.
Japan's ODA fell slightly by 1.8% in real terms in 2002. Most of the fall
from $9.8 billion in 2001 to $9.2 billion in 2002 was because the Yen depreciated
against the US dollar.
EU countries increased their ODA in 2002 by 2.8% in real terms, representing
0.34% of their combined GNI. Prior to Monterrey, EU Members committed to collectively
increase their ODA to 0.39% of GNI by 2006. Features of EU aid included:
- ODA rose in Belgium to 0.42% of its GNI; in Finland
to 0.35% of GNI; in France to 0.36% of GNI; and in Ireland to 0.41% of GNI,
reflecting progress towards the individual commitments made by these countries
in addition to the collective target.
- ODA rose significantly in Greece (by 34.2% in
real terms) – mainly due to higher contributions to multilateral agencies,
especially the EC; and in Italy (by 31.5% in real terms) – reflecting a major
increase in bilateral aid, including debt relief operations in the context
of the Heavily Indebted Poor Country initiative, as well as contributions
to the EC and Global Funds.
- There were minor changes in ODA from the following
EU countries: a slight increase for Germany (0.4%); and decreases for Denmark
(-6.4%), Luxembourg (-3.5%), the Netherlands (-2.2%), Portugal (-4.6%), Sweden
(-2.3%), and the United Kingdom (-3.5% due to a delay in finalising the replenishment
of the World Bank's International Development Association (IDA), which meant
deferring its contribution from 2002 to 2003).
- ODA fell markedly in Austria (by -16.5%) and
Spain (by -15.7%) compared to their 2001 levels, which had been boosted by
exceptional debt relief operations.
Other DAC countries showed the following changes in real terms in ODA in
2002:
- Australia up 2.1%, reflecting its intention to
increase ODA in real terms by 3% by 2002-2003;
- Canada, which intends to double its ODA by 2010,
up 31.6% due, among other factors, to real increases in its ODA programme
and debt forgiveness;
- New Zealand up 0.5%;
- Norway, which seeks to increase its ODA to 1%
of GNI by 2005, up 16%; and
- Switzerland down -5.6%, due to the delay in finalising
the IDA replenishment, which meant deferring its contribution from 2002 to
2003.
Among the non-DAC donors, Korea's ODA rose in current dollars from $265
million in 2001 to $286 million in 2002.
NET OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE IN 2002 |
| |
2002 |
2001 |
|
| |
ODA
US$m
current |
ODA/GNI %
|
ODA
US$m
current |
ODA/GNI %
|
Percent change
2001 to 2002
in real terms (1) |
| Australia |
962 |
0.25 |
873 |
0.25 |
2.1 |
| Austria |
475 |
0.23 |
533 |
0.29 |
-16.5 |
| Belgium |
1,061 |
0.42 |
867 |
0.37 |
13.7 |
| Canada |
2,013 |
0.28 |
1,533 |
0.22 |
31.6 |
| Denmark |
1,632 |
0.96 |
1,634 |
1.03 |
-6.4 |
| Finland |
466 |
0.35 |
389 |
0.32 |
12.5 |
| France |
5,182 |
0.36 |
4,198 |
0.32 |
15.3 |
| Germany |
5,359 |
0.27 |
4,990 |
0.27 |
0.4 |
| Greece |
295 |
0.22 |
202 |
0.17 |
34.2 |
| Ireland |
397 |
0.41 |
287 |
0.33 |
25.4 |
| Italy |
2,313 |
0.20 |
1,627 |
0.15 |
31.5 |
| Japan |
9,220 |
0.23 |
9,847 |
0.23 |
-1.8 |
| Luxembourg |
143 |
0.78 |
141 |
0.82 |
-3.5 |
| Netherlands |
3,377 |
0.82 |
3,172 |
0.82 |
-2.2 |
| New Zealand |
124 |
0.23 |
112 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
| Norway |
1,746 |
0.91 |
1,346 |
0.80 |
16 |
| Portugal |
282 |
0.24 |
268 |
0.25 |
-4.6 |
| Spain |
1,608 |
0.25 |
1,737 |
0.30 |
-15.7 |
| Sweden |
1,754 |
0.74 |
1,666 |
0.77 |
-2.3 |
| Switzerland |
933 |
0.32 |
908 |
0.34 |
-5.6 |
| United Kingdom |
4,749 |
0.30 |
4,579 |
0.32 |
-3.5 |
| United States |
12,900 |
0.12 |
11,429 |
0.11 |
11.6 |
| |
| TOTAL DAC |
56,991 |
0.23 |
52,337 |
0.22 |
4.9 |
| |
| Average Country Effort |
|
0.40 |
|
0.40 |
|
| |
| Memo Items |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. EC |
6,502 |
|
5,691 |
|
1.2 |
2. EU countries combined |
29,093 |
0.34 |
26,290 |
0.33 |
2.8 |
| 3. G7 countries |
41,736 |
0.19 |
38,202 |
0.18 |
6.9 |
| 4. Non-G7 countries |
15,255 |
0.46 |
14,135 |
0.47 |
-0.7 |
| 5. Korea |
286 |
0.06 |
265 |
0.06 |
3.0 |
| |
| (1) Taking account of both inflation and exchange rate movements. |
This newsletter is issued by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) in its capacity as secretariat for the International Parliamentarians’ Conference on the Implementation of the ICPD Programme of Action (November 2002, Ottawa, Canada). These dispatches are intended to highlight important developments taking place around the world so that parliamentarians can be kept informed of and learn from the successes, setbacks and challenges encountered by their fellow parliamentarians in other countries and regions in their efforts to promote the implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development (September 1994, Cairo, Egypt). It should be noted that UNFPA does not necessarily endorse all of the policies described in this newsletter.
Please send mailing list update information to Dave Parks at parks@unfpa.org. If you have any questions or comments on the content of this newsletter, please contact Harumi Kodama at kodama@unfpa.org or Stirling Scruggs at scruggs@unfpa.org.
|