Country Situations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In areas where HIV prevalence is
low, the objective is to maintain those low levels,
with the strategic preference to reach the sub-populations
that may be more at risk for HIV infection (vulnerable
groups) and subsequently for transmission (core transmitters).
Depending on the
country and area, such individuals could include, among others,
injecting drug users, migrant workers, long-distance drivers, men in
the armed services, men who have sex with men, internally displaced
persons, refugees, and sex workers.
In low-prevalence areas, while actions
should be geared towards creating awareness and desensitising
the general population, concerning HIV/AIDS, more focused
actions need to be supported that would be effective
and appropriate for reaching vulnerable and at risk
sub-groups. This means determining which population
groups are at highest risk of infection and ensuring
the political will to safeguard them against the epidemic.
UNFPA may find that programming
targeted-high-risk-group interventions within the context
of a specific HIV prevention component project, would
be more beneficial and produce better outcomes than
trying to address HIV prevention through integration
within on-going traditional family planning and maternal
health component projects.
<<
Back
Home Next >>
|