Country Situations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
There is good evidence globally
that well designed and sustained policies and prevention
programmes can reduce the rate of transmission of HIV.
The combination of preventive strategies that a country
may adopt should, for the most part, be driven by its
local epidemiological patterns.
Economic, social, cultural and behavioural
factors are also important from the perspective of better
understanding the factors that fuel vulnerability and
risk in any given setting.
UNFPA should consider promoting
and where possible supporting countries to conduct in-depth
analysis of the demographic, social, economic, cultural,
behavioural and epidemiological factors in order to
ensure the most appropriate multisectoral response to
the epidemic.
In many regions where UNFPA provides
support, the HIV/AIDS epidemic is still in its early
stages and/or in transition from a nascent and concentrated
epidemic to a more generalized one.
Categorising countries as either
low or high-prevalence based on national prevalence
rates can be misleading as it tends to hide serious
epidemics that are initially concentrated in certain
localities or among specific population groups and also
critical, rapidly increasing epidemics.
When strategic decisions and priorities
need to be made it is necessary, that these often hidden
realities, are taken into account.
<<
Back
Home Next >>
|