Advances in New Technologies and Issues
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
According to epidemiological and
ecological studies, male circumcision is associated
with a reduced risk of acquiring sexually transmitted
HIV infection.
On the basis of such studies controversy
has emerged over the call for circumcision to become
part of a public health HIV risk-reduction strategy.
Proponents of circumcision argue
that there is mounting evidence to correlate male circumcision
with reduced rates of HIV infection and other STIs,
including chancroid, syphilis and genital herpes and
that the practice should therefore be encouraged as
part of an HIV-prevention programme.
The evidence consists of about 40
observational studies that uncircumcised men have about
a two- to eight-fold increased risk for HIV infection.
Other scientists urge caution indicating
that no randomized clinical trials exist to support
the assertion that male circumcision reduces the risk
of HIV infection, and that as yet unidentified confounder
variables (including differences in religion, sexual
practices and hygiene) could be responsible for the
correlation.
Moreover, even if causality could
be proved, male circumcision might be contraindicated
for a variety of reasons. Male circumcision is a procedure
that can potentially lead to infection, excessive bleeding,
dismemberment, and even transmission of HIV through
non-sterile equipment.
Even if the procedure were completely
benign, support for male circumcision could lead to
the erroneous assumption that circumcision was sufficient
to completely prevent HIV infection, which could result
in an increase in risk-taking behaviour.
The effect of male circumcision
on condom use is not known, but there is concern that
condom use would be lessened if male circumcision were
presented as a means of reducing the risk of STIs.
With no definitive cure for HIV/AIDS,
and no vaccine yet available, it is important that any
potential means of reducing the risk of HIV infection
be explored. However, circumcised men are still at risk
and as such proven effective measures such as condom
promotion and use, behaviour change and STI prevention
management must still be the main stay of preventive
efforts while awaiting for more scientific evidence
that validates the claims that male circumcision does
reduce the risk of acquiring HIV infection.
<<
Back
Home Next >>
|